Sudanese diaspora groups and international human rights organisations have voiced strong opposition to the United Arab Emirates’ nomination of Lana Nusseibeh for the position of United Nations Secretary-General. The controversy stems from allegations that Nusseibeh, a seasoned diplomat, previously defended the UAE against claims of supporting Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has been implicated in severe human rights violations.
Nusseibeh’s nomination comes as the current UN Secretary-General António Guterres nears the end of his second term. Her candidacy has sparked debate concerning the UAE’s alleged involvement in Sudan’s ongoing civil conflict, with critics questioning her ability to maintain independence if appointed to the UN’s top role.
Human rights organisations have repeatedly highlighted accusations that the UAE provided support to the RSF, notorious for committing atrocities against civilians during clashes with Sudan’s army. The RSF’s attack on El Fasher in October 2025 was condemned by the United Nations for exhibiting genocidal characteristics.
Hala al-Karib, a Sudanese women’s rights activist, expressed concerns over Nusseibeh’s potential inability to act independently of UAE policies regarding Sudan. She cautioned that her selection could jeopardize efforts to achieve justice for victims of the conflict.
Former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth also criticized Nusseibeh for dismissing allegations of UAE support for the RSF, suggesting her approach could undermine accountability. In response, Nusseibeh has asserted her commitment to supporting UN-led fact-finding missions and promoting transitional justice if she becomes Secretary-General.
Nusseibeh has taken a leave of absence from her ministerial duties in the UAE to demonstrate the independence expected of a UN Secretary-General. The selection process for the role requires a candidate to secure at least nine affirmative votes from the 15-member UN Security Council, avoiding a veto from any of its permanent members: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, and Russia.
The race remains competitive, with former Costa Rican vice-president Rebeca Grynspan previously identified as a strong contender. Nusseibeh’s nomination has added complexity to the selection process, underscoring broader concerns about the independence of international institutions and their capacity to ensure accountability for human rights violations in global conflicts.